Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1930No. Docket No. 128PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On June 1, 1927, the Mack International Truck Corporation, as seller, entered into a conditional sales contract with respondent, as purchaser, whereby the seller agreed to sell to the buyer four Mack trucks for the sum of $14,081.60, upon which a cash payment of $10,500 was acknowledged. The balance of $3,581.60 was made payable in seven installments, the first six of which were in the sum of $500 each and the seventh in the sum of $581.60. The first installment became due on July 14, 1927, and the balance on the fourteenth day of each month thereafter. Deferred payments were made to bear…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conolley v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Griffith v. ReddickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Lindsey v. ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Connell v. HoggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Bullock's, Inc. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Wade v. RathbunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Rathbun v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API