Faulkner v. First National Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff for the value of certain promissory notes averred to have been deposited by plaintiff with defendant as collateral security for a promissory note made to plaintiff by one Beckman and another person. Defendant appeals from the judgment and brings up the judgment-roll, which includes a hill of exceptions.
There are only two questions which need discussion, for we do not think that the minor points made in the briefs require special notice. These two question^ are substantially: 1. Does the evidence support the verdict? and 2. Could the kind of judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Riciotto v. ClementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Burke v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Arzaga v. VillalbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Dennison v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Brown v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Lueter v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Corey v. StruveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Franklin v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.