Legal Opinion

Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1932No. Docket No. 4515PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This action was tried before a jury and the verdict rendered therein is in the following words and figures, to wit (omitting title): "We, the jury in the above entitled cause, find for the plaintiff Vida D. Booth, and against the defendant G.H. Bertram, that the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of the motor vehicle described in the complaint in this action, and if delivery cannot be had, then for the value thereof, and we find the value of said motor…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bonestell v. Western Automotive Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Wilkinson v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Conolley v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. McClung-Logan Equipment Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Williams v. BoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Zhadan v. Downtown L.A. MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Wetherbee v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API