Legal Opinion

Berson v. Nunan

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1883PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

This was an action of replevin brought by the plaintiffs to recover certain household furniture which had been seized by the defendant as sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, under an execution issued in favor of C. H. Voight against Maria Trendle. The seizure was made on the 3d of *551November, 1879. At the time, the furniture was in the actual possession of the execution debtor, who was using it in the business of keeping a boarding and lodging house; but she had purchased the furniture from the plaintiffs and had given her promissory note, secured by a chattel mortgage upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hackett v. ManloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Heyland v. BadgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Griffith v. DouglassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Cardenas v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Alferitz v. BorgwardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Claudius v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Flinn v. FerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Stewart v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API