Redevelopment Agency v. Goodman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KEANE, J. *
These are combined appeals. In Civil 36155, appellants Mervyn J. Goodman and Leona G. Leibert 1 appeal from the trial court’s order denying their motion for an order determining interest on a condemnation judgment rendered against them and in favor of Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco (hereafter “respondent agency”). In 1 Civil 36433, appellants appeal from an order denying them recovery of interest actually earned on funds paid into court pursuant to the judgment, which funds were deposited with respondent clerk, respondent treasurer, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Baum v. BaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Matter of City of Rochester v. . HoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Youngblood v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- County of Ventura v. TillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.