Matter of City of Rochester v. . Holden
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 7, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term appointing commissioners of appraisal in condemnation proceedings and dismissed the proceeding. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCollin, J.
The city of Rochester, the appellant here, under and by virtue of provisions of its revised or re-enacted charter (Laws of 1907, chapter ■ 755) applied to the Special Term of the Supreme Court for the appointment of commissioners to ascertain and report the compensation which Alexander M. Holden and his wife, the respondents here, were entitled to as owners of lands to be taken by the city for municipal purposes. The Special Term, after a hearing, granted the application and appointed three persons commissioners. The Appellate Division, upon the appeal of the landowners, reversed the order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People Ex Rel. Herrick v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Sears v. City of AkronSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Maynard v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Naperville v. WehrleIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Redevelopment Agency v. GoodmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Port of New York Authority v. HemingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.