Legal Opinion
City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 1982No. Civ. 54436PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
The Monterey County Board of Supervisors (hereafter Board) and Rancho Canada de la Segunda, Inc. (hereafter Rancho), appeal from an order stating that the Board failed to comply with the trial court’s peremptory writ of mandate and that a use permit which the Board had issued to Rancho was invalid. We affirm.
Statement of the Case and of the Facts
Rancho applied for a use permit to construct a 376-room resort hotel and lodge complex with 12 tennis courts and other supporting facilities. The Monterey County Planning Commission found that the proposal would be inconsistent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Sanders v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Resource Defense Fund v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of HanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Bowman v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.