Legal Opinion

Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1918No. Sac. No. 2509PublishedCited by 32 opinions

APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Tolo County. W. A. Anderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. C. P. McLaughlin, C. E. McLaughlin, and Arthur C. Huston, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR E. SHAW, J., pro tem.

The question involved in this appeal arises out of a proceeding in eminent domain wherein the plaintiff, Vallejo and Northern Railroad Company (whose successors in interest are the Northern Electric Railway Company and John P. Coghlan, receiver thereof), sought to condemn lands of defendant Reed Orchard Company for railroad purposes. Upon trial of the issues a judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, condemning the land as prayed for and awarding defendant damages and costs in the sum of $105,735.60, the full amount of which plaintiff, within thirty days…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Culver v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Gaston v. LamkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Ex Parte LemonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re OluwaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Legat v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. In Re BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API