Legal Opinion

Baum v. Baum

California Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1959No. L. A. 24936PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This is a motion by defendant to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal on the ground that “the order appealed from i.e. the denial of the motion by the appellant for the appointment of a receiver is not an appealable order.” On inspection of the record it appears that the order in question did not merely refuse appointment of a receiver but, rather, denied plaintiff’s motion seeking a charging order under the provisions of section 15028 1 of the Corporations Code. Consequently it related to enforcement of the judgment and was appealable as a “special order made after final judgment.” (Code Civ. Proc., §…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Yanchor v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Evans v. GalardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Taylor v. S & M Lamp Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API