Legal Opinion

Lakin v. Watkins Associated Industries

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1993No. S030179PublishedCited by 239 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review to decide three issues. First, we must determine whether a postjudgment order denying an award of attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 2033, subdivision (o), is appealable. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it is. Second, we must determine where the burden of proof lies when a plaintiff in a personal injury case claims prejudgment interest, under Civil Code section 3291, on a judgment more favorable than her offer to compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 998, subdivision (b). As will appear, we conclude the plaintiff has…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by239 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Miller v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008

234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API