Legal Opinion
Bringas v. Sullivan
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1954No. Civ. 20001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order granting a motion to discharge an attachment. Plaintiffs had filed a verified complaint for breach of a written contract, and an affidavit for an attachment. The writ was issued and levied. Defendant moved to discharge the attachment. He did not file a counteraffidavit. His motion was made on the ground the attachment was improper under sections 537 and 538 of the Code of Civil Procedure permitting attachment in an action on a contract for the direct payment of money, and based it on the “files, papers and proceedings herein.” The validity of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walker v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Rose v. PearmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. Super DVD, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Welsh v. WoodsHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- E. I. Noxon Construction Co. v. Wallace Process Piping Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.