Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rose v. Pearman

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1958No. Civ. 22788PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appeal from order discharging or dissolving attachments. Plaintiffs Rose, Anspach and O. W. Childs Company sued defendants John B. Pearman and Margaret B. Pearman for deceit in the sale to them of all the outstanding stock of Leo G. MacLaughlin Company, a corporation, seeking damages in the sum of $75,000; in a second count of the complaint they sought declaratory relief. Leo G. MacLaughlin Company is a coplaintiff and joins in seeking declaratory relief. Defendants answered, denying the alleged fraud and asserting counterclaims for payments in the nature of salary alleged to be due them…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Dunn v. MackeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Tyson v. ReineckeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Fisk v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Coombs v. HeersDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1973
  3. Minor v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Challenge Cream & Butter Assn. v. Royal Dutch DairiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Stotland v. Mobile Homes Engineering Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API