Welsh v. Woods
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*253OPINION OP THE COURT BY
MIZUHA, J.
Plaintiff’s amended complaint contained a first count based on quantum meruit for professional services rendered. He alleged that he had “rendered professional services to defendant of a reasonable value of $50,000 of which sum defendant has paid plaintiff the sum of $6,000, leaving a balance due and owing plaintiff the sum of $44,000 * * Upon the argument plaintiff submitted his case on this count.
Garnishee process was served upon Woodson K. Woods, III, First National Bank of Hawaii and Walston & Go., Inc. They filed disclosures, only that of the bank showing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fisher v. ConsequaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1809
- Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Roelofson v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
- Stiff v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chase v. GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Flores v. Rawlings Co., LLCHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Papadakos v. SpoonerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Frank F. Fasi Supply Co. v. Wigwam Investment Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1969
- Welsh v. WoodsHawaii Supreme Court · 1963