Legal Opinion

Welsh v. Woods

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1963No. 4283PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*253OPINION OP THE COURT BY

MIZUHA, J.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint contained a first count based on quantum meruit for professional services rendered. He alleged that he had “rendered professional services to defendant of a reasonable value of $50,000 of which sum defendant has paid plaintiff the sum of $6,000, leaving a balance due and owing plaintiff the sum of $44,000 * * Upon the argument plaintiff submitted his case on this count.

Garnishee process was served upon Woodson K. Woods, III, First National Bank of Hawaii and Walston & Go., Inc. They filed disclosures, only that of the bank showing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Fisher v. ConsequaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1809
  3. Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Roelofson v. HatchMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Stiff v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chase v. GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Flores v. Rawlings Co., LLCHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Papadakos v. SpoonerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Frank F. Fasi Supply Co. v. Wigwam Investment Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1969
  5. Welsh v. WoodsHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API