CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc. v. Super DVD, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAY, P. J.
Appellants, Super DVD, Inc., a California corporation (Super DVD) and Julius Liu, defaulted on a commercial equipment lease, which resulted in the issuance of a right to attach order (RTO) in favor of respondent, The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc., a Delaware corporation (CIT). Appellants now appeal, contending the trial court erred in issuing this order. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
On September 14, 2000, appellant Super DVD entered into a master lease agreement with CIT for the lease of certain equipment to be utilized in its business, pursuant to lease schedules to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Force v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Walker v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Lewis v. SteifelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Bringas v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kemp Bros. Construction v. Titan Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Kinney v. OvertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Metric & Inch Tools, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Park v. NMSI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Rabo Agrifinance, LLC v. PammaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025