Legal Opinion

Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1945No. L. A. 18994PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff asks damages for breach by defendants of an exclusive sales agency contract under which defendants had been marketing plaintiff’s products. From a judgment for defendants entered pursuant to jury verdict plaintiff appeals, contending, among other things, that the court erred to its prejudice in certain instructions given the jury. We have concluded that such contention must be sustained and the judgment reversed.

In order that the application and effect of the instructions complained of may be more readily comprehended it is expedient, before quoting them, to relate some history of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Continental Car-Na-Var Corp. v. MoseleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Freedman v. Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of St. Matthias ParishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API