Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Velasquez

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 9, 2004No. Misc. AG No. 14, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 approved the filing by Bar Counsel of a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Ray I. Velasquez, the respondent. In that petition, Bar Counsel charged him with misconduct, as defined by Maryland Rules 16-701(i), 2 and 16-812, and consisting of violations of various of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by the latter Maryland Rule. In particular, the respondent was alleged to have violated Rules 1.3, Diligence, 3 1.4, Communication, 4 1.5, Fees, 5 1.5,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldsboroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Van NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PakCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KwartengCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API