Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Joseph

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 27, 2011No. Misc. Docket AG No. 11, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Joel David Joseph (“Respondent”), charging him with professional misconduct arising out of representations made to the California Bar and third persons, regarding his residency in connection with applications for appearance pro hae vice in California’s state and federal courts. Petitioner charged Respondent with violating Rules 3.3(a)(1), 2 8.1(b), 3 and 8.4(c) and (d) 4 of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API