Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kwarteng
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, the petitioner, by Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Charles Owusu Kwarteng, the respondent. The petition charged, consistent with the complaint of Allen E. Carter, that the respondent violated Rules 1.1, Competence, 2 1.2, Scope of Representation, 3 1.3, Diligence, 4 1.4, Communication 5 1.16, Declining or Terminating Representation, 6 8. 1, Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters, 7 and 8.4, Misconduct, 8 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DunietzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AngstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. TinskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.