Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldsborough
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 12, 1993No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 3, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
This extremely troubling disciplinary matter reached this Court when the Attorney Grievance Commission (the Commission) filed a petition for disciplinary action against George J. Goldsborough, Jr. alleging violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility and the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct. The petition arose from a complaint filed with the Commission by Catharine Sweitzer, a former client of Goldsborough, as well as from other information the Commission discovered while investigating Sweitzer’s complaint. In accordance with Rule…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.