Attorney Grievance Commission v. Pak
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCathell, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission (“the Commission”), acting through Bar Counsel, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a)(l)1 filed a petition for disciplinary action in the *574Court of Appeals against Hekyong Pak, a.k.a. H. Christina Pak, respondent. The petition charged that respondent violated several of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“the MRPC”).2 Specifically, the petition alleges that respondent, through her actions subsequent to a default on a loan secured by her parents, violated Rules 3.3 (Candor the Tribunal),3 4.1 (Truthfulness in Statements to Others),4 5.5 (Unau*575thorized…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. TankoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.