Legal Opinion

ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 25, 1994No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 23, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

The respondent, Howard Stuart Myers, was charged, in a petition for disciplinary action, filed by Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, with violating Rules 3.3(a)(1) 1 and Rule 8.4(c) 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The rules were violated, the petition alleged, by a response the respondent gave to a question posed by the District Court judge concerning his traffic record. Specifically, it averred that in response to the question, “if he had ever gotten a ticket before?” the respondent “falsely stated, under oath, that he had not had a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API