ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. Myers
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.
The respondent, Howard Stuart Myers, was charged, in a petition for disciplinary action, filed by Bar Counsel, on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission, with violating Rules 3.3(a)(1) 1 and Rule 8.4(c) 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The rules were violated, the petition alleged, by a response the respondent gave to a question posed by the District Court judge concerning his traffic record. Specifically, it averred that in response to the question, “if he had ever gotten a ticket before?” the respondent “falsely stated, under oath, that he had not had a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MonfriedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.