Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. Berkshire Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided March 26, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-18PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BILLINGS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michael and Linda O’Neill moved this court on March 9, 1992, to confirm an arbitration award in the amount of $450,806.26 and to order judgment on that award. Defendant Berkshire Mutual Insurance Company (“Berkshire Mutual”), pursuant to the arbitration clause contained in the policy issued to plaintiff, requested a de novo trial following the arbitrators’ decision. For the reasons stated hereinbelow, plaintiffs’ motion is granted.
Background
On March 15, 1988, plaintiff Michael O’Neill was struck from behind while riding his bicycle by an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pepin v. American Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies v. BugailiskisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Parker v. American Family InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Hanover Insurance v. LosquadroNew York Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.