Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1988No. C0-87-782PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Appellant Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company (Midwest) issued an automobile insurance policy to respondent David Schmidt. Part C of the policy provided uninsured motorist coverage. It likewise provided for arbitration on demand of either party with respect to coverage or amount of damages. The arbitration provision, however, was modified by the extension to either party of a further right to trial when the arbitration award exceeded the minimum limit for body injuries provided in the applicable financial responsibility law. 1 Concluding that by granting a further right to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Grover-Dimond Associates, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Arbitration Between Ramsey County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 91, Local 8Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Larx Co. Inc. v. NicolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Phoenix Insurance v. RosenIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  4. Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API