Pepin v. American Universal Insurance
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHEA, Justice.
These cases are consolidated for appeal. The plaintiffs appeal from Superior Court orders denying their motions to confirm arbitration awards. Both of these arbitration awards were in excess of $25,000. In both cases the trial justice 1 ruled that a clause in the uninsured-motorist-coverage section of the plaintiffs’ insurance contracts that allows either parly to demand trial de novo when an arbitration award exceeds $25,000 was enforceable. We reverse.
The material facts of both cases are virtually identical. Both plaintiffs suffered injuries resulting from automobile…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Dutson v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Soprano v. American Hardware Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Schmidt v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by31 opinions
- Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Phoenix Insurance v. RosenIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GrabbertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.