Legal Opinion

Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1998No. 96SC643PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

The issue presented by this case is whether a trial de novo clause in an uninsured motorist provision of an automobile insurance policy violates public policy.1 The trial de novo clause allows the insured or insurer to demand a trial on the merits after arbitration when the amount awarded in the arbitration proceeding exceeds a specified limit. The trial court ruled that the trial de novo clause was unenforceable. The court of appeals reversed the judgment. See Huizar v. Allstate Ins. Co., 932 P.2d 839 (Colo.App.1996). We closely scrutinize the effect of the trial de novo clause for…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Goodson v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. HuizarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Thompson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API