Legal Opinion

Parker v. American Family Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 20, 2000No. 3-97-0534PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breslin

The issue before the court is whether an insurance policy’s under-insured motorist arbitration provision is contrary to public policy if it permits a trial de novo only for awards in excess of the minimum liability set forth in the Illinois Safety and Family Financial Responsibility Law (625 ILCS 5/7- — 100 et seq. (West 1998)). The trial court concluded that such a structure is contrary to public policy and entered a judgment confirming an arbitration panel’s award in favor of the insured, Dennis Parker. Defendant American Family Insurance Company (American Family) appealed and we affirmed.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Collins v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Phoenix Insurance v. RosenIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Padilla v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kost v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Samek v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Costello v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API