Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Marsh
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the court of appeals erred in reversing the trial court’s granting of partial summary judgment for appellants and remanding the cause for resolution of a factual issue. For the reasons that follow, this court modifies and affirms the judgment of the court of appeals.
It is a long-standing principle of law that an insurance policy is a contract, and that the relationship between the insurer and the insured is purely contractual in nature. Ohio Farmers Ins. Co. v. Cochran (1922), 104 Ohio St. 427. Therefore, the terms of the policy must be mutually…
2Cited by94 opinions
- Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Hillyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cohen v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.