Legal Opinion

Hildebrandt v. City of Fairbanks

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1993No. S-4960PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

This appeal arises out of a collision between Michael C. Hildebrandt’s vehicle and a City of Fairbanks (City) police vehicle which was in pursuit of a fleeing arrestee’s vehicle. Three questions are presented by this appeal: whether the superior court erred by treating the fleeing motorist as a separate party for purposes of apportionment of fault pursuant to AS 09.17.080; whether the superior court erred in ruling that Hildebrandt was comparatively negligent; and whether the superior court erred in granting summary judgment to the City in Hildebrandt’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bauman v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. G & a CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Alaska Greenhouses, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Day Ex Rel. Strosin v. WillisAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Beaux v. JacobAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Neary v. McDonaldAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Yi v. YangAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API