State, Department of Highways v. Green
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
The state brought eminent domain actions 1 in the superior court seeking portions of the lots owned by the Greens and Good-mans 2 for use in the planned widening of Tudor Road in Anchorage. The state claimed a right-of-way extending 50 feet on either side of Tudor Road’s center line. The Greens and Goodmans argued that express provisions in the patents to their lots limited the state’s right-of-way to 33 feet on either side of the center line. After the state had amended its complaints, the parties stipulated to consolidation of the cases for determining liability…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Braund, Inc. v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Howarth v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- National Bank of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.