Legal Opinion

Prentzel v. State, Department of Public Safety

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2002No. S-9979PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

State troopers arrested a man without a warrant because they thought he was violating his court-imposed conditions of release from a prior charge. He was never charged with violating the release conditions. The man sued the State of Alaska and individual Alaska State Troopers. Was it error to dismiss on the pleadings his negligence claims against the state and his negligence and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the individual troopers? Because the pleadings alone do not allow us to decide the resulting issues, we reverse in part the dismissal of his…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Smith v. StaffordAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Larson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. J & S SERVICES, INC. v. TomterAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API