Legal Opinion

Estate of Day Ex Rel. Strosin v. Willis

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1995No. S-5543PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

The issue before the court is whether law enforcement officers owe a legal duty to fleeing offenders to refrain from pursuing them in order to protect the offenders from harm that may arise from the offenders’ own actions during a high speed pursuit. We hold that they do not.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In June 1985 Anchorage International Airport Security Officer James Willis was on a routine perimeter check of the airport. He drove past a park, noting several cars there in violation of the park curfew. Observing what appeared to be a liquor bottle on the roof of one of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. York v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Boyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lindstrom v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. State v. CarpenterAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Torrie v. Weber CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. SandsnessAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Karen L. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API