Neary v. McDonald
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Daniel Neaiy sued Bobbie L. McDonald, Sr. and Claudette McDonald on a negligent entrustment theory after a vehicle driven by their adult son, Bobbie L. McDonald, Jr., collided with Neary’s motorcycle. The superior court found that there were no genuine issues of material fact and granted summary judgment to the McDonald parents. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Bobbie L. McDonald, Jr. (Bobbie Jr.) bought a 1987 Nissan Pathfinder on June 2, 1994, with a cash payment of $7,490. He was then eighteen years old. He was a carpenter *1207making about $7 per hour…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Webb v. City and Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- McCart v. MuirSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Peterson v. HalstedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ardinger v. HummellAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- McGlothlin v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Nelson v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Universal Motors, Inc. v. NearyAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.