Legal Opinion

Bauman v. State, Division of Family & Youth Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1989No. S-2572PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendants State of Alaska and four public officials filed a summary judgment motion in superior court. Plaintiffs Robert and Judy Bauman and their daughter R.J.W., appearing pro se, did not oppose the motion. The superior court granted summary judgment. The Baumans and R.J.W. appeal. They argue that (1) they did not receive fair notice of the requirements of summary judgment procedure; and (2) summary judgment was improper because material factual issues remained for trial.

I

On August 28,1984, the Fairbanks office of the Department of Health and Social Services, Division of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Robert Louis Roseboro v. Sam P. Garrison, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Warden of Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Arthur Lewis v. Gordon H. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Harlan L. Jacobsen v. Richard FillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sopko v. Dowell Schlumberger, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Yurioff v. American Honda Motor Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kaiser v. SakataAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Greywolf v. CarrollAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API