Legal Opinion

Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1993No. C5-93-110PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal raises a question not previously decided, respecting judicial review of the county’s quasi-judicial decision to deny a special use permit. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by employing a summary judgment to direct issuance of the permit. We affirm.

FACTS

Early in 1992, respondent Earthburners, Inc. applied to Carlton County for a permit to operate a portable so-called soil roaster on a 300-acre site where a gravel pit is now operated. The soil roaster device is employed to cleanse petroleum-contaminated soils. The parties agree that this operation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Earthburners, Inc. v. County of CarltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API