Earthburners, Inc. v. County of Carlton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal raises a question not previously decided, respecting judicial review of the county’s quasi-judicial decision to deny a special use permit. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by employing a summary judgment to direct issuance of the permit. We affirm.
FACTS
Early in 1992, respondent Earthburners, Inc. applied to Carlton County for a permit to operate a portable so-called soil roaster on a 300-acre site where a gravel pit is now operated. The soil roaster device is employed to cleanse petroleum-contaminated soils. The parties agree that this operation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Earthburners, Inc. v. County of CarltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994