Legal Opinion
Swanson v. City of Bloomington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 25, 1988No. C3-86-782PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
John Swanson and Danald Cadmus brought a declaratory judgment action in Hennepin County District Court challenging the Bloomington city council’s denial of an application to subdivide a residential lot in the Timberglade 2nd Addition into two residential lots. Swanson and Cadmus sought to establish that the city’s action was arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable and they requested an order that would compel subdivision or, in the alternative, would find that there was a taking. The district court, after a review of the record, granted summary judgment to the city. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Condor Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. City of St. Paul, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Earthburners, Inc. v. County of CarltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.