Legal Opinion
People v. Joerger
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1936No. Civ. 5419PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
This is an action to condemn a right-of-way for highway purposes. The only controversy is over the award, which was paid into court by plaintiff. The trial court adjudged that such award was owned by, and should be paid to respondent bank, and ordered the clerk of the court to pay the same to respondent. The appeal is from the judgment.
The agreed statement of facts discloses the following situation: On January 25, 1932, plaintiff commenced an action to condemn a right-of-way for highway purposes over and across certain real property owned by appellants, Louis P. Joerger…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steinhart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Security Co. v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Davis v. San Lorenzo RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Marblehead Land Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Fletcher v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Los Angeles v. RicardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Peninsula Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- City of Long Beach v. AistrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Milens of California, a California Corporation v. Richmond Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.