Legal Opinion
City of Long Beach v. Aistrup
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 1958No. Civ. 22872PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.
The city of Long Beach brought this proceeding to condemn several parcels of realty. Defendants Victor K. Hart, F. Walter Bergmann, and John Gerald Quirk each owned in fee one of the parcels sought to be condemned. The county of Los Angeles was named a defendant as it claimed that by reason of liens for taxes for the tax years 1955-56, 1956-57, and 1957-58 it had an interest in various parcels, including those of Hart, Bergmann, and Quirk. An interlocutory judgment was entered on June 5, 1957, and the award was deposited in court. Final order of condemnation was entered July 10, 1957.
The…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In Re Knox-Powell-Stockton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. LockeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Board of Supervisors v. LonerganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Issac v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Orme v. State ex rel. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.