City of Los Angeles v. Ricards
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
The City of Los Angeles (City) appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent real property owner on her claim against the City in inverse condemnation. The superior court found that construction by the City at a location upstream from the owner’s property in the Big Tujunga Wash caused a diversion of waters that destroyed a private bridge over which she held an easement and which constituted the sole legal access to her property. She remained without access until a public bridge was constructed two years later. During this period the City refused to admit' liability for the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.