Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Ricards

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1973No. L.A. 30138PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The City of Los Angeles (City) appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent real property owner on her claim against the City in inverse condemnation. The superior court found that construction by the City at a location upstream from the owner’s property in the Big Tujunga Wash caused a diversion of waters that destroyed a private bridge over which she held an easement and which constituted the sole legal access to her property. She remained without access until a public bridge was constructed two years later. During this period the City refused to admit' liability for the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API