Legal Opinion
Marblehead Land Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1923No. Civ. No. 4143PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
The two matters now awaiting our disposition arise out of an application for a writ of review, and the title above set forth is the title of the proceeding for review. In order that our ruling upon the two specific matters which now engage our attention may be thoroughly understood, it will be necessary for us to state with some particularity the questions of fact and law which are involved in the original proceeding for the writ of review.
The present constitution of California has always contained a provision to the effect that “Private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- De Baker v. Southern California RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Robinson v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Zellerino v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. JoergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- City of Needles v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.