Steinhart v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
WRIT OF PROHIBITION to the Superior Court of Mendocino County. J. M. Mannon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Sullivan & Sullivan, E. A. Bridgford, and Jesse W. Lilienthal, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent from making an order in a condemnation suit for a right of way, at the instance and for the Albion Southeastern Railway Company, a corporation, putting such corporation in possession of certain lands of petitioner during the pendency of the proceeding and before the value of the land sought to be taken has been ascertained.
The order is sought pursuant to section 1254 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and waiving some question as to whether the land sought to be condemned is sufficiently described in the petition, it may…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Coburn v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fox v. Western Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1867
- Davis v. San Lorenzo RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Sanborn v. BeldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Otsuka v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Portneuf Irrigating Co. v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.