Legal Opinion
Milens of California, a California Corporation v. Richmond Redevelopment Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1982No. 80-4081PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Richmond Redevelopment Agency appeals from the decision of the district court that it took Milens’ land by inverse condemnation and must pay just compensation.
We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I. The Facts.
In 1966 the City of Richmond approved the Richmond Redevelopment Agency’s redevelopment project 10-A (downtown Richmond). The plan divided property into two sorts — that which was to be acquired by the Agency and that which was to remain in the hands of owners. The plaintiff, Milens of California, owned a parcel of the second sort at 916 Macdonald Avenue,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. GrizzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. 99.66 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Little Oil Company, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.