Legal Opinion

LuMac Development Corp. v. Buck Point Ltd. Partnership

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1988No. OT-88-16PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause comes on appeal from the Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas, wherein that court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee, Buck Point Limited Partnership (“Buck Point”), substituted defendant in the action below.

In 1963, a portion of the real estate (“Parcel 1”) owned by Robert and Elsie Quinn and William O. Hemminger was sold by deed to Gar Realty Company. The deed contained six restrictions or conditions limiting the use and enjoyment of the conveyed property. Grantors retained the other portion of the land (“Parcel 2”) for their own use until 1966. Parcel 2 was then sold by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Slife v. Kundtz Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Benjamin v. Deffet Rentals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Siferd v. StamborOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Newman v. WittmerMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Halls v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. DeRosa v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Benner v. HammondOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Brooks v. OrshoskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API