Legal Opinion

Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1983No. E-83-13PublishedCited by 382 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

This is an appeal from summary judgment entered April 18, 1983, by the Erie County Court of Common Pleas. Upon our review of the pleadings, accompanying memoranda, evidentiary materials, and depositions contained in the record now before us, the following facts are revealed.

I

Appellants in the instant case are Carl Viock, his wife, and his children. Ap-pellees are appellant Carl Viock’s employer, Stowe-Woodward Company (“Stowe-Woodward”) and Roger Gravlin, plant manager at Stowe-Woodward. Appellant Carl Viock began his employment with appellee Stowe-Woodward in January 1968. Appellant’s…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hounshell v. American States InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Norris v. Ohio Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by382 opinions

  1. Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Smathers v. GlassOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. McGee v. Goodyear Atomic Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Bank One v. Swartz, Unpublished Decision (4-21-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

377 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API