Legal Opinion

Newman v. Wittmer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1996No. 95-406PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

Appellants, Arthur and Carlene Wittmer (Wittmers), appeal from the Gallatin County, Eighteenth Judicial District Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law determining that the Wittmers’ mobile home violated subdivision covenants. In its Conclusions of Law, the District Court issued a mandatory injunction ordering the Wittmers to remove their home from their lot in the subdivision. The court also concluded that Stewart Newman, Susan Newman, Dave Stelter, Mary Stelter, Dave Klatt, Cory Klatt and Susan Brantsma (Respondents) were entitled to recover attorneys fees and costs. We affirm in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Foy v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Goodover v. Lindey's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Murray v. BEJ Minerals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Evergreen Highlands Ass'n v. WestSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Braach v. GraybealMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. National Casualty Co. v. American Bankers InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Creveling v. IngoldMontana Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API