Legal Opinion

Benner v. Hammond

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1996No. 95CA2116PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Judge.

This appeal arises from the granting of an injunction by the Ross County Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiffs-appellees Mark A. Benner and fifteen neighbors in the Sunset View Subdivision, Block A of Union Township (hereinafter “Sunset View”), successfully obtained an injunction ordering defendant-appellant Jeffrey A. Hammond 1 to remove his manufactured home from lot twenty-five of Sunset View. Appellant was the owner of lot twenty-five, but his deed, as well as the appellees’ deeds, referred to restrictions filed with the Ross County Recorder’s Office which prohibited the use of a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houk v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Dixon v. Van Sweringen Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. LuMac Development Corp. v. Buck Point Ltd. PartnershipOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Sylvester v. Howland Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DeRosa v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Hutchison v. HillWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Brooks v. OrshoskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Ellis v. Patonai, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Heather Lake Assn. v. BilliterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API