Van De Hey v. United States National Bank
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiffs are the principal owners of Van De Hey Track Transport, Inc. (corporation), and they are the trustees of certain employe benefit plans for employes of the corporation. The plans are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). 29 USC § 1001 et seq. Defendant bank made loans to the corporation, which executed and renewed a promissory note in the bank’s favor. As part of the loan transaction, some of the employe benefit plans also executed and renewed various documents, including collateral agreements and assignments, by which they pledged time certificates…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley BankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1979
- Robert S. Fremont and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw Company, Robert S. Fremont, Ronald L. McCarthy and Henry W. Dybal v. McGraw CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Rogers v. SaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Van De Hey v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Associates Investment Co. v. ClaeysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Van De Hey v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Hannan v. R. Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.