Legal Opinion

Hannan v. R. Concrete, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1988No. A8410-05824; CA A38236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiffs are trustees of several trust funds administered for the benefit of members of the Cement Masons Union. Defendant R. Concrete is a corporation engaged in the business of concrete paving and is owned by defendant Ellis. It and the union are parties to a collective bargaining agreement. Defendants Allen control and manage R. Concrete and, in addition, own Allen Concrete, a concrete paving contractor with a nonunion workforce.

Plaintiffs brought this action under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 USC § 185, for an accounting and for specific performance of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jim McNeff, Inc. v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shaw v. Northwest Truck Repair, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Kraftco, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
  4. Paddack v. FurtickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Van De Hey v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StarksUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Abbott v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API