Legal Opinion
Van De Hey v. United States National Bank
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1992No. CC 16-89-04913; CA A62152; SC S37349PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.
Plaintiffs in this case are the trustees of employee benefit plans (the plans) subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (29 USC § 1001 et seq). Plaintiffs allege that defendant induced them to violate ERISA. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing claim preclusion, lack of jurisdiction, statute of limitations, and preemption. The trial court dismissed the complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to state a claim. Van De Hey v. U.S. National Bank, 102 Or App 203, 793 P2d 1388 (1990). We affirm the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. Reyes-CamarenaOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Whitaker v. Bank of NewportOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WardOregon Supreme Court · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.