Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Saylor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1987No. A8409 05447; CA A35289PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*482JOSEPH, C. J.

In this action, which is generally subject to the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), ORS 30.260 to ORS 30.300, plaintiff asserts a violation of 42 USC § 1983.1 He alleges in his first claim that, on September 19,1982, defendants Saylor, Blackman, Hill, Boehmer and Peterson physically and verbally assaulted him, in violation of his rights under the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the federal constitution. The individual defendants, except Peterson, were at that time deputies of the Multnomah County Sheriff; Peterson was an officer in the Gresham Police Department.2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nelson v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rogers v. SaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Wayne Acton and Judy Acton, Guardians Ad Litem for James Acton v. Vernonia School District 47jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Van De Hey v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Lofft v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API