Legal Opinion

Van De Hey v. United States National Bank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 1990No. 16-89-04913; CA A62152PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant bank and assign error to the granting of the bank’s motion to dismiss. We affirm.

In Van De Hey v. U.S. National Bank, 90 Or App 258, 752 P2d 848 (1988), 1 an earlier action arising out of the same events, we held, as relevant, that plaintiffs’ claims were subject to exclusive federal jurisdiction under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). After our decision, plaintiffs filed an action asserting the same or similar claims in the United States District Court. Roche J. Van De Hey, et al. v. United States National Bank of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van De Hey v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. State v. GoodellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van De Hey v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Aguirre v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Miller v. Pacific Trawlers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Klinger v. Morrow County Grain Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Abbott v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API